CONFIDENTIALITY IN MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION


INTRODUCTION
With rise in number of disputes and litigations the burden of courts has eventually increased and there has been a growing trend among people to settle their matters outside the court. In desire of speedy trials and easy resolution of their matter the parties in dispute have these days started opting for Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms like arbitration and mediation. Even though there are some differences between these two different modes of ADR but primarily in both the proceedings there is a neutral third party who tries to bring the two parties in dispute to a settlement through discussions. Apart from many other benefits, confidentiality of such proceedings is the biggest incentive that motivates the parties to opt for them.
NEED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY
In order to bring the parties in dispute to an amicable settlement the first requirement is that they should feel safe to discuss their matter in entirety and without hesitation. It is, therefore, necessary that they shall trust that their statements or opinions expressed during the proceeding shall not be jeopardised and used against them at any later stage or in open court. Therefore there is a need to bind all the parties to dispute along with any other person they bring to proceedings and the neutral third party (mediator/arbitrator) from disclosing anything discussed during the proceedings.
HOW MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS ENSURE CONFIDENTIALITY?
To ensure privacy and confidentiality there are certain requirements of arbitration/mediation proceedings like contrary to court proceedings third parties don’t access mediation procedures. The mediator’s interference is private regardless of whether it delivers the settlement and determines the question. Similarly, the parties are expected to keep all issues that describe the mediation procedures as private. Hence, there is always a clause in arbitration agreement that any person attending the proceeding shall be bound to keep all the details as confidential and none of such detail shall be admitted in courts.
CONFIDENTIALITY UNDER ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) was enacted in India in line with the UNCITRAL Model Law. Article 75 of the Act provides that the mediator and the parties should keep private all problems or issues determined with the pacification procedures including the settlement understanding, aside from where its announcement is essential for reasons of usage and requirement.
LEGAL POSITION IN INDIA
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 enacted in India in line with UNCITRAL Model Law states that the arbitrator along with the parties shall keep the proceeding as confidential including the settlement agreement[1].
Further, Mediation and Conciliation Rules 2004 were laid down by the Delhi High Court in order to elaborate the process and requirements of such proceedings. Rule 20 of the document states that the mediator shall not disclose any information that it has received from one party under the disclaimer of it being confidential. Further, the mediator cannot be compelled to disclose the details of proceedings or any information from the proceedings before any court, tribunal or group of persons. The rules also bind the parties to keep all the details of the proceedings as confidential and not to disclose any information or express their opinion before any third parties. The rule also clarifies that the proceeding or the statement of any witness during the proceeding shall not be recorded.
Moti Ram (D) Tr. LRs and Anr. v Ashok Kumar and Anr[2], a landmark Supreme Court judgement offers legal authority on the point of confidentiality. In this case the Hon’ble court clarifies that apart from the settlement agreement no details of mediation proceeding shall be admitted in the court as it is confidential. It has also been proposed to include this statement of court in Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2018[3]. The court further stated that in case the settlement could not be reached, the mediator shall only state this fact as it is.
In another important judgment of Rama Aggarwal vs. PIO, Delhi State Legal Service Authority,[4] it was held that information about mediation proceeding cannot be obtained even through an RTI. This is an exception to general rules relating to RTI and it was further clarified that such an exception was in greater interest of general public.
ADVANTAGES OF CONFIDENTIALITY
1.   It ensures the security of parties that anything they say during the proceeding would not be used against them later.
2.   It develops a faith in mediator as well as he cannot use any statement or opinion from the proceedings in favour of one party and against another.
3.   The corporations or organisations have the faith that their trade secrets or inside information are safe and will not be leaked so as to jeopardise their customers or clients resulting in a probable loss of goodwill.
4.   Hence confidentiality in mediation or arbitration proceedings ensures the full disclosure and frank discussion between the parties so as to reach an amicable settlement.

DISADVANTAGES OF CONFIDENTIALITY
1.   Confidentiality of mediation or arbitration proceedings is sometimes misused by parties in a way that they try to mould the facts of case in such a way that it favours them. This is possible only because they know that any of their statements during the proceedings cannot be used in court.
2.   Another disadvantage is that because of keeping these proceedings confidential, any details of it cannot be used in normal courts and if the matter cannot be solved during the proceeding itself, entire process might have to be repeated in the court obviously may cause undue delay.
CONCLUSION
Hence confidentiality is an important aspect of arbitration, mediation and other ADR methods and laws in India are in compliant with the requirements of confidentiality in such proceedings according to international standards. There are certain disadvantages of confidentiality in such proceedings but it is surely the biggest incentive to bring parties to settle their disputes out of the court.
[1] S. 75 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
[2] (2011) 1 SCC 466
[3] S. 42A of Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2018
[4] CIC/SA/A/2015/000305


school of legal education

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LOK ADALATS – CRITICAL EXAMINATION UNDER ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION LAW

Image
INTRODUCTION Alternate Dispute Resolution (or ADR) is a mechanism used to ease out the burden of courts by resolving them through various different modes like mediation, conciliation, arbitration, negotiation and Lok Adalats. Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 (hereinafter “LSA”) provides for constitution and formation of Lok Adalats which is the form of ADR having traits of arbitration, mediation and conciliation. The Parties to dispute amicably come before Lok Adalat to settle their case where the Bench acts as a mediator and aids them to settle the matter through conciliation and such settlement if agreed by both parties is made binding upon them. Lok Adalats are constituted in consonance with the provisions of Article 39-A of Indian Constitution which provides for equal justice and free legal aid forming part of Directive Principles of State Policy. They are organized to protect and promote justice based on equal opportunity. Lok Adalats are strategized to decrease the bur...
Read more

BIGAMY UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955

Image
The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is seen as a landmark social legislation as it has reformed law of marriage. It has curtailed the religious and ceremonial overtones, and instead brought around a more practical as well as contractual aspects. THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955, IS APPLICABLE ON: ·       Any person who is a Hindu by religion in any of its form: a Virashaiva, a Lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj; ·       any person who is a Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh by religion; and ·       any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion. WHAT IS BIGAMY? The dictionary meaning of the term states its meaning as, “the act of entering into a marriage with one person while still legally married to another.” BIGAMY AND HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955: Section 5(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, prohibits biga...
Read more

UNIFORM CIVIL CODE (UNDER ARTICLE 44)

Image
WHAT IS THE UNIFORM CIVIL CODE (UCC)? A Uniform Civil Code in a country ensures uniform rules for all people of the country irrespective of their caste, culture, religion, and tribe. It is specified under the Directive principles of the Indian Constitution as “The State shall endeavor to secure for citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” In India, Goa is the only state which has the Uniform Civil Code, which is called the “Goa Civil Code” or the “Goa Family Law”. WHY IS THE UNIFORM CIVIL CODE A TOPIC OF DISCUSSION? The debate on the adoption of the Uniform Civil Code throughout the country stems from the days when Dr. B.R Ambedkar was part of the Constituent Assembly. He had argued that Uniform Civil code should be followed by all people of the country but was opposed by the leaders of the major religious communities who were in favor of the personal law. Personal laws are laws pertaining to a particular religious group or community relating to ...
Read more